|

MISSILE DEFENSE
BRIEFING REPORT NO. 204, July 10, 2006
American Foreign Policy Council, Washington, DC
Editor: Ilan
Berman
|
RIPPLES FROM NORTH KOREA'S
MISSILE TESTS...
North Korea has sent shockwaves through the international community by firing an
unprecedented salvo of ballistic missiles. On July 4th, flouting international
criticism, the DPRK carried out a total of seven missile launches - including
one of its 6,000 kilometer "Taepo Dong 2" intercontinental ballistic missile,
which experts believe is capable of reaching the continental United States. CNN
(July 5) reports that all seven missiles fell into the Sea of Japan, and the "Taepo
Dong 2" trial was an apparent failure, with the ICBM landing some 200 miles west
of Japan after just 40 seconds of flight.
The international response to North Korea's missile tests has been immediate.
U.S. officials have condemned the DPRK's "provocative behavior," and urged a
resumption of the stalled six-party talks over the regime's nuclear program.
North Korea's missile tests have also reinvigorated political support for the
Bush administration's missile defense efforts. A number of top Congressional
leaders - including Senator George Allen (R-VA), a presumptive presidential
candidate in the 2008 elections - have revived calls for the continued
deployment of "an effective missile defense system," the Washington Times
(July 6) reports.
Japan, meanwhile, is taking a different tack. The Asahi Shimbun (July 5)
reports that Tokyo has leveled a series of nine sanctions-including a six month
disruption of direct transportation between Japan and the DPRK-in retaliation
for the missile tests, and is now seeking additional punitive measures against
North Korea via the United Nations Security Council (albeit with little success
so far). In a dramatic hardening of their country's defense posture,
policymakers in Tokyo have also opened a debate about the constitutionality of
preemptive military action against North Korean military bases, should the need
arise. "If we accept that there is no other option to prevent an attack ...
there is the view that attacking the launch base of the guided missiles is
within the constitutional right of self-defense. We need to deepen discussion,"
the Associated Press (July 10) cites Japan's Chief Cabinet Secretary, Shinzo
Abe, as saying.
...AS PYONGYANG'S STRATEGIC PARTNER LOOKS ON
Kim Jong-il's provocative missile moves are also being watched closely from
another corner. South Korea's official Yonhap news agency (July 1) reports that
ten senior missile engineers affiliated with Iran's clerical army, the Pasdaran,
recently visited the DPRK to participate in the preparations for the North's "Taepo
Dong 2" launch. Their apparent goal? An on-site review of Chinese-origin
ballistic missile technologies for possible procurement by the Islamic Republic.
But the delegation visit could also signal something more; according to sources
cited by Yonhap, Tehran and Pyongyang also may be planning a joint project to
develop new liquid fuels for their respective ballistic missile arsenals.
TAIWAN TAKES ON THE MAINLAND
Amid the furor over North Korea, another Asian nation is also planning to carry
out missile tests. Citing a local television news network, Reuters (July 6)
reports that Taiwan is preparing to test fire an indigenously-developed missile
capable of hitting the PRC. Once operational, the 600-kilometer range "Hsiung
Feng III" will put areas of China's coastline opposite the island nation within
striking distance - a major development in the tense, multi-year missile
stand-off along the Taiwan Strait.
IRAN'S BALLISTIC MISSILE STRATEGY
The Islamic Republic of Iran is making major investments in its ballistic
missile program - as well as in a nascent space capability - in an effort to
deter the United States and acquire the ability project power globally,
according to Israel's top missile defense expert. "The Iranians are realists,"
writes Uzi Rubin, the founder of Israel's Missile Defense Organization, in the
June 20th edition of the Jerusalem Issue Brief. "Their stated policy is
to deter the U.S. and its allies by threatening a war that will cause such
damage at such a price that this option will become unacceptable. With this
perspective, they are investing very smartly in deterrence enhancers and force
multipliers instead of replacing obsolete equipment." In the long run, however,
Iranian efforts are focused on the ability "to project power beyond Iran, over
Europe and over the United States." And once its space program is mature, Rubin
warns, "Iran is bound to project power on a global scale."
|
|
Copyright
© 2006, American Foreign Policy Council.
All Rights Reserved.
|
|