In the early days after Hamas’ terror attacks on October 7, 2023, Israel witnessed something unique: thousands of Israelis abroad rushed home to make themselves available for military service or help the country in other ways.
Nearly three years later, however, the larger trendline is clearly headed in the other direction. As The Financial Times recently reported, Israel is experiencing a significant population outflow, with 150,000 Israelis leaving the country since 2023. In its coverage, the British paper framed the matter as “the exodus from Israel.” Although that depiction is a bit overwrought, there’s no question that the issue is concerning—albeit not for the reasons most casual observers think.
The dominant cause is often depicted as war fatigue (as it largely is in The Financial Times’ framing). After more than 1,000 days, the country’s multi-front war against Iran and its proxies is taking a clear toll in terms of morale, and Israelis are increasingly voting with their feet.
There is a measure of truth to that observation, certainly. Still, Israel simultaneously ranks as one of the happiest countries on the planet, coming in eighth in the world in the latest global ranking notwithstanding nearly three years of war. Israelis, in other words, are quintessentially happy warriors.
So, what explains the current demographic shift? The old trope that “all politics is local” applies here, because Israel’s population outflow has its roots in multiple domestic causes.
The first is a persistent lack of accountability. Many Israelis I’ve spoken with are thoroughly frustrated by the ongoing refusal of Israel’s ruling coalition to claim meaningful responsibility for the institutional failures that led to the October 7, 2023 attacks, which saw the single largest killing of Jews since the Holocaust. That state of affairs represents a historical aberration.
When the government of former Prime Minister Golda Meir failed to properly anticipate the 1973 Yom Kippur War, for example, the post-conflict reckoning (in the form of the Agranat Commission, an independent national inquiry) saw her government collapse. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has led the country for a generation, refuses to submit to a similar independent state commission; instead, he is advancing a politically appointed alternative so his government can better manage the potential fallout.
The second involves uneven military participation. When David Ben-Gurion, the father of modern Israel, formulated Israel’s foundational civic compact in 1948, he explicitly included a carve-out for ultra-Orthodox students to ensure buy-in from the larger Haredi community in the new national project. Back then, the cohort in question was tiny, numbering in the hundreds. In the decades since, however, that broader community has ballooned and now the ultra-Orthodox represent more than 14 percent of Israel’s population of nearly 10 million.
That growth has made the extremely low rate of military participation among young Haredim impossible to ignore. The ultra-Orthodox community is increasingly resented by other segments of Israeli society, who are painfully aware from their personal experiences that the burden of extended military service is shared unevenly at present. Meanwhile, religious parties currently have a stranglehold on national politics, to the point that they have managed to scupper repeated attempts to widen military and national service requirements for the country’s ultra-Orthodox.
The third is the need for a new warfighting approach. Historically, Israel’s military has sought to wage short, sharp conflicts that took the fight to its enemies and onto their territory as quickly as possible, to compensate for the country’s lack of strategic depth. This approach proved effective in the 1956 Sinai Campaign, the 1967 Six-Day War, and many smaller conflicts.
But that approach doesn’t apply to Gaza, where Israel is now involved in what is basically a protracted irregular warfare mission. At the same time, its expeditionary warfare against Iran, Hezbollah in Lebanon and other targets, like Yemen’s Houthis, has locked the country into a perpetual campaign footing that is challenging for the country’s standing military and even more so for its reserve force. This is the reason why knowledgeable strategists, including my colleague Eran Ortal, increasingly question the current “total war” mindset.
These pressures make clear that Israel’s population outflow is about much more than war fatigue. It’s also a barometer of confidence—both in the country’s political leadership and in the social compact underpinning Israeli society. The real question, then, isn’t simply how many Israelis are leaving, but whether the conditions prompting them to do so can be resolved.
That question will loom exceedingly large when Israelis head to the polls this October.