Russia Reform Monitor: No. 1752
Strongarm tactics ahead of parliamentary polls;
An Arctic boondoggle?
Strongarm tactics ahead of parliamentary polls;
An Arctic boondoggle?
ROK wants China to send DPRK defectors to the South;
China sends police force to UN peacekeeping mission in South Sudan
As the past three years have shown, President Barack Obama and his predecessor, George W. Bush, don't often see eye-to-eye on foreign policy. On at least one issue, however, the two appear to be in full agreement. Both have stated clearly and repeatedly that the radical, revolutionary regime that rules Iran must not be permitted to acquire nuclear weapons. And yet, neither the current president nor the previous one made serious headway on this most serious of national security challenges.
China on soft power offensive in Bangladesh;
Hu meets with KMT leader on sidelines of APEC
Ever since the late October release of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s latest report on Iran, the White House has been working overtime to convince the world that it is, in fact, committed to preventing the Islamic Republic from going nuclear. Last month, responding to criticism of his Iran policy from Republican challengers, President Obama argued that the sanctions levied by his Administration to date have had “enormous bite.”
The reality, however, is considerably more modest. While it has publicly pledged its commitment to a serious economic offensive aimed at derailing Iran’s nuclear drive, in practice the White House has done far less than necessary to achieve that objective.