Publications

Losing The War Of Ideas?

December 3, 2007 The Claremont Institute

After a short two-year tenure, Karen Hughes now departs as Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs. She concentrated on the public affairs area of her job by creating the Rapid Response Unit and regional media hubs—things that anyone would find hard to believe the U.S. government was not already doing before her arrival. Hughes inherited the detritus from the 1999 destruction of the U.S. Information Agency, and tried to put back some of the missing building blocks of public diplomacy. However, by almost every index, we are not doing well in the war of ideas. Some say we have already lost.

Eurasia Security Watch: No. 163

December 2, 2007

Hezbollah's swelling coffers;

Saudis and Libyans fuel Iraqi jihad;

A change of heart in prison;

The struggle over Kirkuk's oil;

Moscow gets a dose of its own medicine...

Confronting Iran: U.S. Options

November 14, 2007 Ilan I. Berman

Today, the Islamic Republic of Iran looms large on the agenda of policymakers in Washington. Over the past several years, it has become clear that the Islamic Republic is pursuing a massive, multifaceted endeavor to acquire a nuclear capability—and that it is making rapid progress toward this goal, despite pressure from the world community. Yet Iran’s nuclear program is just part of a larger picture. The Islamic Republic’s enduring support for terrorism, its growing and pernicious regional role, and its radical, uncompromising ideology currently also pose serious challenges to the United States, its allies and American interests in the greater Middle East.

So far, policymakers in Washington have failed to muster an adequate response on any of these fronts. As a result, the Islamic Republic has gained precious time to entrench itself in Iraq, expand its support for terrorists and bring added permanence to its nuclear effort. The logical conclusion of the current status quo is a mature Iranian nuclear capability, continued Coalition casualties in Iraq, and emboldened terrorist groups across the region. If it hopes to avoid such an outcome, the United States must harness all the elements of national power into a strategy that focuses on three concrete goals vis-à-vis Iran: counterproliferation, counterterrorism, and counterinsurgency.

Flawed Federalism

October 18, 2007 Ilan I. Berman The Washington Times

Timing, the old saying goes, is everything. Just ask Sen. Joseph Biden, Delaware Democrat. For years, he has been sounding the bell about the need to devolve Iraq into its constituent parts: one Kurdish, one Sunni and one Shi'ite. And for years, his suggestions about Iraqi "federalism" have fallen on deaf ears. But now, in the wake of Gen. David Petraeus' long-awaited September report on the "surge," Mr. Biden's idea for the former Ba'athist state is suddenly getting some traction.

Iran, The Rainmaker

September 30, 2007 Ilan I. Berman The National Interest

Ever since its start six years ago, the United States has been waging the War on Terror chiefly on the Sunni side of the religious divide within Islam. The principal targets have been Al-Qaeda and its affiliates. As recently as September 2006, the White House’s counter-terrorism strategy was still focused overwhelmingly on the Bin Laden network and its offshoots, which were seen as the vanguard of “a transnational movement of extremist organizations, networks, and individuals” threatening the United States. By contrast, the vision articulated by the president in his 2007 State of the Union Address is substantially broader. It encompasses not only Sunni extremists, but their Shi‘a counterparts as well. And, for the first time, it clearly and unambiguously identifies not just “terrorism” but a specific state sponsor — the Islamic Republic of Iran — as a threat to U.S. interests and objectives in the greater Middle East.
ÂÂ

Eurasia Security Watch: No. 159

September 18, 2007

Saudi Arabia's cordon sanitaire;

Riyadh-Tehran tensions rise;

The next threat from Central Asia;

The Ikhwan's next plan;

Religious politics rear their head in Bishkek...

Getting China Right

September 14, 2007 The Journal of International Security Affairs

American politics is entering a phase in which China is likely to increase in prominence, and where the fundamentals of U.S. policy toward the People’s Republic are likely to be called into question. Over the next two years, the White House’s approach is unlikely to change. But the Democrat-controlled Congress and presidential contenders alike can be expected to critique Administration policy and offer alternatives to it.

Eurasia Security Watch: No. 158

September 5, 2007

Jitters in Saudi;

Turkey's military prepares to head back;

And the winner is...Hizb ut-Tahrir;

Energy security, Saudi style;

The KRG comes into its own...

Eurasia Security Watch: No. 156

August 8, 2007

The "

axis"

victorious?;

A new competitor for Muslim "

hearts and minds;

"

In Jerusalem, another vote of no confidence;

Toward a new Central Asian definition of terrorism...